@Article{YanaiGraEscZicMar:2020:EfLaCo,
author = "Yanai, Aurora Miho and Gra{\c{c}}a, Paulo Maur{\'{\i}}cio Lima
de Alencastro and Escada, Maria Isabel Sobral and Ziccardi,
Leonardo Guimar{\~a}es and Martin, Fearnside. Philip",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia (INPA)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia (INPA)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia (INPA)} and {Instituto Nacional
de Pesquisas da Amazonia (INPA)}",
title = "Deforestation dynamics in Brazil's Amazonian settlements: Effects
of land-tenure concentration",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
year = "2020",
volume = "268",
pages = "e110555",
month = "Aug.",
keywords = "Agrarian reform, Settlement project, Colonization, Deforestation
pattern, Amazon forest, Land concentration.",
abstract = "Brazils Amazon deforestation is a major global and national
environmental concern, and the ability to model and project both
its course and the effect of different policy options depends on
understanding how this process occurs at present and how it might
change in the future. The present paper addresses one key factor
in Amazon deforestation: land-tenure concentration in settlements.
Brazils policies for establishing and regulating settlement
projects represent critical government decisions shaping the
landscape in the 5 \� 106 km2 Legal Amazonia region. We
used remote-sensing data and information provided by the National
Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform (INCRA) to evaluate
the effect of land-tenure concentration in a settlement project
(Projeto de Assentamento) located in a frontier area where
cattle-ranching is expanding. We identified the actors and their
deforestation patterns in the Matupi settlement in the southern
part of Brazils state of Amazonas. We spatially identified actors
who concentrated lots (the parcels of land distributed to
individual settlers) in 2011 and assessed whether the
concentration was done by individual landholders or by families
(where members merged their lots and the clearing was done
together). Deforestation rates (19952011) were estimated for each
type of actor and the trajectory of deforestation in the
settlement (cumulative deforestation to 1994 and annual
deforestation 19952016) was also analyzed. Concentrators occupied
28% (9653 ha) of the settlement and 29% of the lots (152 lots)
analyzed; the numbers of lots concentrated ranged from two to ten.
Concentrators of two lots and non-concentrators were the
predominant actor types in the settlement. The mean annual
clearing per landholding for concentrators of two lots (families:
4.1 \� 2.8 ha (mean \� SD); individuals: 5.1
\� 4.6 ha) was greater than for non-concentrators (1.7
\� 1.2 ha), despite their having similar patterns of small
clearings. Concentrators of three or more lots had mean annual
clearing per landholding between 6.2 \� 12.2 ha and 23.9
\� 38.7 ha and, the pattern of patches cleared per year
>34 ha in area was predominant. The deforestation rate per lot was
higher among concentrators as compared to non-concentrators,
showing that lot concentration speeds deforestation. Analysis of
deforestation patterns helps to better understand the process of
lot concentration by spatially identifying the predominant
patterns of each type of actor. The approach used in our study
could assist authorities in identifying and monitoring land-tenure
concentration in settlements. Agrarian-reform policymakers need to
monitor this process, since it speeds deforestation in Amazonian
settlement projects, as well as undermining the social objectives
of the agrarian-reform program.",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110555",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110555",
issn = "0301-4797",
language = "en",
targetfile = "yanai_deforestation.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}